Menu

The Latvian Сourt Has Recognized the 'Like' as Written Consent

By
Photo: Latvian court recognized the like - as written consent
Source: https://martech.org
Photo: Latvian court recognized the like - as written consent Source: https://martech.org

The Riga Regional Court has ruled that the 'Thumbs Up' emoji can be interpreted as officially granted written consent.

This was reported by the Delfi publication.

The court considered a dispute between an employee and an employer regarding wrongful termination. In particular, the case materials mentioned that the employer informed employees of the need to 'perform their duties at the workplace on Wednesdays' - for which he wrote a corresponding message on the corporate Slack platform. The plaintiff reacted to the message with a 'thumbs up' emoji. In the court's opinion, such a reaction signified written consent.

In its decision, the court relies on Article 1505 of the Civil Code, which states that 'in case of doubt about the meaning of words, the meaning and intent expressed or otherwise manifested by the parties to the legal act should be taken into account.' Additionally, the court relied on the Cambridge Dictionary, which interprets the word 'emoji' as 'acknowledgment of something.' Furthermore, the court believes that the plaintiff could not have been unaware of the meaning of this reaction to the message.

Recall that a similar court decision was made in Canada in July of this year. At that time, the court established that the 'thumbs up' emoji can confirm the fact that a person formally enters into a contract.

A farmer from Saskatchewan, Canada, who was involved in flax supply, was discussing the delivery of a new batch with a customer. After that, the buyer sent a draft contract to the farmer via messenger, to which he received a response in the form of a 'thumbs up' emoji.

Later, the flax was not delivered on time, as the farmer expected the contract to be sent by email in order to have the opportunity to review the terms in more detail and sign it. The farmer argued that the emoji simply confirmed that he received the flax contract, but did not mean that he agreed to the terms of the agreement. However, the court interpreted the emoji as a digital signature. The judge emphasized that the emoji is considered not only as an 'unconventional way of signing a contract, but also allows to identify the signer, as he did it from his phone.

Subsequently, the farmer was ordered to compensate for damages in the amount of 82,200 Canadian dollars, approximately 61,000 US dollars.

Recommended

Latest news

US Warns Apple and Google to Remove TikTok from App Stores on 19 January

12.16.2024 16:22
Life

The Best Christmas Trees and Markets in Europe

12.14.2024 09:05
Economics

Cryptocurrency Market: Greed Above All

12.13.2024 15:30
Culture

Christmas Is All Around You

12.13.2024 13:07
Technology

Latest Gaming Releases of 2024

12.12.2024 16:05

Similar articles

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you've provided to them. Cookie Policy

Outdated Browser
Для комфортної роботи в Мережі потрібен сучасний браузер. Тут можна знайти останні версії.
Outdated Browser
Цей сайт призначений для комп'ютерів, але
ви можете вільно користуватися ним.
67.15%
людей використовує
цей браузер
Google Chrome
Доступно для
  • Windows
  • Mac OS
  • Linux
9.6%
людей використовує
цей браузер
Mozilla Firefox
Доступно для
  • Windows
  • Mac OS
  • Linux
4.5%
людей використовує
цей браузер
Microsoft Edge
Доступно для
  • Windows
  • Mac OS
3.15%
людей використовує
цей браузер
Доступно для
  • Windows
  • Mac OS
  • Linux